 |
|
Redefining Network Economics Of Triple Play Services
The service provider landscape is rapidly
changing, and the pace of change will only increase over the next few years.
Traditional telecommunication companies (telcos) that once only offered
voice and data services are rapidly mobilizing their resources to design and
deploy a converged IP infrastructure that is capable of delivering voice,
data, and video services. Cable companies, having spent billions upgrading
their infrastructure over the past few years, have been slowly rolling out
voice services, contributing to the gradual erosion of the telcos’ core
revenue stream. Even wireless service providers have thrown their hat into
the video ring with plans and architectures, such as the IP Multimedia Subsystem
(IMS), in anticipation of delivering video and other services over a wireless
last mile.
What appears inevitable is the level of competition among service providers will
only increase going forward. With the growth of Internet based services, service
providers also face the threat of competition from content providers or aggregators
as these companies attempt to leverage the Internet to bypass the service providers
who own the network infrastructure. As all of these new market dynamics develop
over the next few years, service providers must formulate a clear strategy that
positions them well regardless of the business models or technologies that win
in the market.
From an economics perspective, there are three fundamental parts to the business
equation:
Revenue – Expenses
= Profits
At the end of the day, the service provider’s goal is to maximize
profits. To achieve this, there are fundamentally only two ways to do
this—increase
revenue or decrease expenses. The innovation and experimentation that
is occurring with the new entertainment and content based services
are really focused on the revenue part of the equation. Although important,
the service provider who also focuses on the expenses portion of the
economic profit equation will be the one that is able to create the most
shareholder value in the long run.
Redefining the Broadband
Edge
Fortunately for service providers there is plenty of innovation occurring
among infrastructure vendors that will help them realize significant capital
(CAPEX) and operations (OPEX) expenses. Innovation is occurring in every
category from storage, to compression, to service management.
In particular, network equipment vendors have made some of the most significant
advancements. Through the use of programmable ASIC technology, modular operating
systems, and carrier Ethernet, next generation edge routers that combine
the functions of what used to require multiple devices are now available
on the market. This advancement enables a new approach to building broadband
networks that simplifies the design, provides consistent services regardless
of access technology, and significantly reduces both CAPEX and OPEX.

As the figure above shows, deploying a new generation
of routers that integrates edge routing, Ethernet aggregation, and subscriber
management into a single service platform simplifies the network. Reducing
the number of network devices has several benefits. First, sparing costs
are drastically reduced since there is only one piece of equipment instead
of three. Storing and managing the logistics of spare equipment is one
of the hidden costs that are often not evaluated but make up a significant
part of the overall CAPEX. Second, having fewer devices results in savings
in terms of hosting, expenses and even heating or cooling. Finally, the
field technicians and operations personnel only need to be trained on
a single piece of equipment rather than three. Given the hundreds, if
not thousands, of operations people involved, this alone provides significant
benefits in terms of productivity by reducing the amount of time they
spend in training classes versus managing the network.
New Network Economics
A recent study by Yankee Group validates the economic benefits
of this next generation broadband architecture. Over a 12 month
period, they conducted primary research and interviewed dozens
of network planners at service providers around the world. While
conducting the research, Yankee Group concluded that service
providers must reexamine their network architecture for next
generation services and make their networks operational cost
effectively.
Yankee Group then analyzed the total cost of ownership (TCO) of building
a triple play network and uncovered that integrating edge routing, Ethernet
aggregation , and subscriber management yields measurable TCO advantages.
The highlights of the study are displayed below.
| TCO
Advantages Summary |
|
|
TCO Advantage |
22% |
| |
Capital Expenditure |
20.9% |
| |
Operational Expenditure |
52.6% |
|
Internal Rate of Return |
39.8% |
|
Net Present Value |
51.8% |
|
|
|
A copy of the report
can be downloaded from Redback’s website at
http://www.redback.com/resources/resources_yankee.html. |
A Winning Strategy
for IPTV
With the myriad of technology advancements, changing business models,
and regulatory debates, the overall end game is still unclear. But what
is clear is that service providers must build a next generation, converged
network to deliver voice, data, and video services. Furthermore, building
this new network in the traditional manner will result in a capable network
but one that does not maximize the profit potential for service providers.
With the advancements in networking technology today, service providers
have the opportunity to redefine their network economics and really change
the underlying cost structure for delivering next generation services. No
matter what happens in terms of business models or regulations, service
providers who build the most flexible and cost effective networks will have
a strategic advantage over those who stick to traditional architectures
and products.
To enter the video market, service providers must build a next generation
network that can support voice, data, and video services. Although risky,
it is a necessary risk the telcos must take on due to the competition they
are experiencing. However, with the right network, this risk can be minimized,
and the network can become a strategic asset in the long run.
|